Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm honestly started to get pissed seeing these articles on HN every day. Aren't we technologists? I see these articles and it's just people who can't accept the future, or feel threatened by it, or are pissed they are not contributing to it.

I'm an expert in my field with decades of experience, and a damn good programmer, and Cursor is like zipping down the street on a powered bike. There is no wishful thinking here!

Can I use it for everything? No, and that applies to every tool. But ffs I have to read here every day on HN some self-important blogger telling me I'm imagining things.






> I'm honestly started to get pissed seeing these articles on HN every day. Aren't we technologists?

Funnily enough, that's exactly what the article asks.

> I'm an expert in my field with decades of experience, and a damn good programmer, and Cursor is like zipping down the street on a powered bike.

Oh look, an unverified claim. Go through the first list in the article, and ask "what we, as technologists, know about this claim".

You can also actually read the article and see that I actually use these tools every day.


Yeah, I read your article. It's the latest in the stream of "everyone is full of crap" about LLMs.

You say you've used it to build multiple projects, but then title it "everything is wishful thinking". That makes no sense. You're either click-baiting or have an inconsistent stance.

> This is crypto all over again

No. The fundamental vision for BTC is that it grows to be a mainstream currency for a huge variety of use cases. If BTC continues to be used just for pirate sites, black market, etc, then it will be considered to have failed. With LLMs the success is immediate. We don't need LLMs to solve every software problem, for them to be massive accelerator of daily coding.


> That makes no sense. You're either click-baiting or have an inconsistent stance.

Or you haven't actually understood a single thing from the article.

Like the fact you say "aren't we technologists" immediately followed by a completely unverifiable claim that everyone is supposed to take at face value, uncritically.

And any criticism is immediately labeled as "crap", "people who can't see the future" etc. Remind you of anyone?


You had a fine criticism in the article: that people's claims of success or failure should be accompanied by contextual information, to prevent bad extrapolations. But then you title it "Everything around LLMs is still magical and wishful thinking." Was this tongue in cheek? Hyperbole for effect? Because it seems you're saying that when the data comes out, people will realize this was all a fraud.

There's a big difference between stating "everything" here is wishful thinking, versus calling for more data to understand the strengths and weaknesses.


"People make huge outrageous claims without backing them up with anything except 'trust me bro', and people uncritically accept that as truth" would probably make a better title.

But if you can't go past the title, well, you might have bigger problems.


My only problem is when people say everything about LLMs is wishful thinking.

I've used it to build multiple projects and yeah my consensus is that LLM-bros are in denial about this new wave of AI tech.

We're not there yet. Try again in 20.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: